Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lance Khrome's avatar

Super-clarifying, especially *Fisher* in comparison to *Miller* and *Lang*....also, the substantive differences between the rioters' conduct and that of tRump with respect to §1522(c)(2), which for even a layman untrained in law, the circumstances couldn't be more different. Any way one slices it, the man is toast - no immunity, let's go to trial.

Expand full comment
Greg Morrow's avatar

The Court's intervention in 2000, and its generally poor reception, may have contributed to making it gunshy in 2020. But there are lots of ways that 2020 was different from 2000, and none of them would make the Court want to take 2020 election cases more than it did the 2000 case.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts